Frugaling

Save more, live well, give generously

  • Home
  • Start Here
  • Popular
    • Archives
  • Recommended
  • Contact
  • Save Money
    • Lifestyle Downgrade
    • Save Money with Mindfulness
    • Save at Starbucks
    • Psychological Trick To Reduce Your Online Shopping
    • Best Freebies
  • Minimalism
    • 8 TED Talks To Become A Minimalist
    • We Rent This Life
    • Everything Must Go
    • Lifestyle Downgrade
    • The Purchase Paradox: Wanting, Until You Own It
    • Nothing In My Pockets
  • Social Justice
    • Destroy The 40-Hour Workweek
    • Too Poor To Protest: Income Inequality
    • The New Rich: How $250k A Year Became Middle Class
    • Hunter Gatherers vs. 21st Century Desk-sitters
  • Make Money
    • Make $10k in 10 Months
    • Monetize Your Blog
    • Side Hustle for Serious Cash
  • Loans
    • 5 Rules To Follow Before Accepting Student Loans
    • Would You Marry Me?
    • Should I Have a Credit Card If I’m In Debt?
    • $50k in Scholarships in 70 Minutes

Stop Predicting The Future, You’re Terrible At It!

By Frugaling 7 Comments

Share This:

Coffee and Journaling

We humans are really good at convincing ourselves of our “upper hand” — that we can see the “truth” when others cannot. We repeat stories of winning hands, the right stocks, and big paydays with our closest friends. Examples and supposed successes of prediction are trumpeted in our skewed media landscape, too.

For instance, CNBC and other financial news networks feature stock chartists who create lavish drawings of candlesticks, moving averages, and support levels. Lines are drawn and circles made on fancy touchscreens. When a stock fails to perform as predicted, it’s written off as a statistical anomaly. And nobody returns to the err. The reality is that any stock-picking strategy is fallible because the herd knows about it (or soon will). These technical mavens’ moves are already priced into stocks.

Scientists can also be poor predictors of future technology and advancement. As an astrophysicist, Neil deGrasse Tyson, explains, “…what happens is, if you try to go too far into the future, there is no way you are going to predict the cross-pollination of ideas and fields that produce things that are not extrapolations of anything going on at that time.” He exemplifies this technological development with the iPhone, as it wouldn’t have been created without GPS satellites, cell towers, and the commercialization of space. Variables needed to coalesce and come together to make the idea possible. Predicting each of these individual components is nearly impossible.

Predictive ability chart
Variability shifts from 0 to ∞ across time. From short to long-term periods, our ability to predict what’ll happen next suffers. Also, what do you think of my chart-drawing skills? 😉

Psychologists are another fallible group that’s highlighted for near-telepathic powers. Popular culture seems to hold high esteem for their predictive abilities. They are depicted as readers and savants of the mind. Watch what you’re thinking, they might just read your body language, thoughts, and emotions! The reality is that psychologists aren’t fantastic at predicting behavior; slightly better than the lay public, but that’s not saying much. At their best, psychologists center on past behaviors as predictors of future behavior. Much like the stock chartist or scientist, psychological/behavioral prediction is sort of like analyzing an historical stock market chart and looking for patterns.

In failing to see our losses and failures of prediction, we risk creating confirmation biases. These psychological tricks of the mind make us think we are right — that our hypotheses have time and time again come true. We repress our failures in favor of successes, but in doing so, jeopardize our ability to accurately plan for the future. That’s when we stand to lose boatloads of money.

The fact is, we are fallible creatures. Seemingly, we are basically limited by the amount of knowledge available on the world. At a long enough timeline, nearly everyone fails.

By accounting for predictive limits, we can protect and preserve our wallets. Now, it’s all about what we do with this realization. These are five fast rules for managing your money without genius predictions:

1. Budget based on present day information

The present day includes your current income and expenditures. If you’re budgeting for a car, Christmas presents, or anything else, your budget should account for today’s income — not chances for the future. This will always keep you within limits. Unfortunately, many people use pay raises and predicted promotions to account for future purchases. This mentality can lead to excess debt and complicated repayment plans. Avoid the drama by budgeting based on today’s information — not what tomorrow might be like.

2. Be careful with retirement predictions

Companies like Betterment and Wealthfront have some sexy chartists! They beautifully illustrate the capability of compounding interest and continued investments in average performing stock markets. However, this tends to smooth over the swings of market swings and does not account for the unexpected. In fact, Betterment has a tool that attempts to predict with 50/50 accuracy how your money will perform over a set period, but it’s better to make consistent investments and look at the principal — not the predicted total.

3. Build up emergency funds

From a car accident to strange toenail fungus, you never know when you’ll need to pay for some extra costs. We cannot predict when an accident or the end of a job could occur. To account for our predictive inability, let’s build emergency funds. Most financial experts suggest people maintain about 3 months of solid income, which would cover expenses while you search for a new job or deal with an accident.

4. Avoid following interest rates

Tens of “online banks” are propping up with teaser interest rates. Instead of chasing the next biggest thing, stick with the consistent. For example, Ally Bank has earned my trust and respect after years of solid performance and service. This online bank doesn’t have wacky fees, gives me free checks, and pays a solid interest rate in both checking and savings. When you find a solid, long-term rate, stick with the bank. It pays to find a good company and then worry about making more income elsewhere — not following the next greatest interest rate.

5. Invest regularly – don’t chase bottoms

This tip comes from one of my hardest investing lessons. When it comes to putting money in the stock market, don’t call bottoms. Humans inability to predict is never worse than right here. If you think the market has crashed, you’ll likely be proven wrong. The stock market has tons of false bottoms and tops. Prediction isn’t generally your friend. Instead, I use average investment amounts and make regular investments. When the market suffers, I tend to invest more. But avoid the chase and focus on making consistent investments.

Filed Under: Make Money, Save Money Tagged With: bank accounts, Checking, cnbc, future, Investments, management, money, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Prediction, Psychology, savings, science

Google is the Internet, Too Big to Fail

By Frugaling 6 Comments

Share This:

google is the Internet, Too Big to Fail
Today, I woke up late, turned on my cellphone’s screen, and saw six new emails. I touched my fingerprint to the display, unlocked the phone, and briefly checked the messages. The contents and senders weren’t all that important though. What was striking, in this brief moment, was what I realized: Google is the Internet.

We’ve been living with the Internet as we know it for a couple decades now. Technology companies have come and gone, but the behemoths have grown to epic proportions. Amazon, Apple, Google, Facebook, and Microsoft have all become some of the largest companies in the world. But there’s a distinct difference between those other names and Google (or, Alphabet, as it’s now called).

The company launched on August 18, 2004 on the Nasdaq Stock Exchange as GOOG. The four-letter ticker symbol was met with great fanfare and excitement. People wanted in on this inventive company that was revolutionizing search, ads, and online video.

Founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, penned an IPO letter before the launch of the stock. They detailed how Google would be different from all the rest. Shareholders wouldn’t be given special privileges and likely wouldn’t benefit from dividends (any time soon). Their votes wouldn’t matter, as control of the company would steadfastly be kept with those in leadership. And the stock could trade wildly, as profits weren’t of utmost importance. Page and Brin wanted to, first and foremost, build great technologies.

This focus on innovation over quarterly profit gains was a winning combination. Alphabet now sits as the second largest market capitalization — to Apple — in America. From a scrappy startup to tens of thousands of employees and billions in profits, this has been a meteoric rise. But it hasn’t always been an easy ride.

Every step they took, they were met with scrutiny. Countless antitrust lawsuits suggest Google is being monopolistic or manipulating search results in their own favor. There are accusations that the company doesn’t respect user’s privacy, and can be easily compelled to hand over what they know to information-hungry government surveillance organizations. They’ve been sued for driving around neighborhoods scanning people’s wi-fi networks and locations, too.

Despite these challenges, their efforts don’t seem to be slowing. The company is creating new hubs around the country. Heck, just north of where I used to live in Colorado they’re building an extensive mini-campus for Googlers! Lest you think construction and new-hires are their only areas of growth, think again. Alphabet is branching into artificial intelligence in mind-bending ways, too. The team, aptly named Google Brain, is leading the charge to develop machines that think for themselves, learn, and become smarter. Right now, they’re capable of beating chess and go champions, moving objects more efficiently, and finding answers more rapidly. In time, it’s easy to see these technologies testing humans’ capabilities.

Amidst this rapid ascendency into artificial intelligence and machine learning is also a company with more earthly ambitions: storing the world’s data. When I get on my smartphone or computer, check my emails in Inbox by Gmail, type out a note about research in Google Drive, write new appointments in Google Calendar, conduct a Google Search to find the 2004 Founders’ IPO Letter for this article, check a stock price on Google Finance (GOOG is at $782 right now), and then wrap this all up by looking at photos from last week on Google Photos, Google is at the heart of it.

Importantly, amidst this growth is an important consideration: most everything is free. For the frugal people that follow my blog, I wouldn’t be surprised if you embraced this cost-effective solution as I do. If you use other technologies, you’ll be spending a small fortune in comparison to Google’s products. Want to get an Apple iPhone? It’ll cost you $600-800 off contract. Google’s smartphones cost about $300-400 less. Want to use a word processor? Microsoft’s will cost you about $10 per month for access. Google’s is free. Interested in getting a new laptop? A good Mac or PC could run you $800-1000. Google’s Chromebooks are about $200-500.

Yes, people will argue that you’re sacrificing your privacy. Some say, “If you use Google, you’re the product because they sell your data to advertisers!” While factually blurry, the gist is true. We’re exchanging this right to services (like the Google Doc I’m typing this into) for our data and privacy. Contrary to popular belief, no individual advertiser has my data; instead, Google aggregates the world’s data for its advertisers.

The cost savings that Google has handed to us has led to an information revolution. Schools can afford to reduce technology costs, while increasing students’ access to the Internet and productivity tools. If we want an answer to Pythagorean theorem, we just Google it. Want to take a free, online course? Google it and start watching the YouTube videos. The answers are there for the taking. Information has been democratized and it’s not because of a government agency or hardware manufacturer. It’s this one software and search company.

So here we are, with Google as the Internet. It’s everything we interact with and rely on to get things done; at least, for much of us. You might be thinking I love this progression, advancement, and technological prowess. But to be honest, I’m concerned.

Here we are in the 21st century, and one company seems to be leading everything. If there’s real competition, they either build their own competitor or swallow it up through acquisitions. People are getting rich — wealth is spilling into their coffers. Meanwhile, we place our trust, data, and reliance on this one company to handle it all.

We don’t get to vote on Google’s proceedings. They aren’t a government agency. What they choose to do with our data is their decision. And even if we used tools like Google Takeout to take everything off their servers, we’d probably end up using Google Search, YouTube, and other Google services to get through our day. We’re stuck with this Internet leader — for better and for possibly worse.

As much as I love the company and everything they’ve done to make the Internet more affordable to everyone, I wonder what it might look like if something failed, new leadership took over that wasn’t friendly to users, or if governments around the world started demanding even more from Google’s servers. Right now, Google is too big to fail. And just like banks, that’s a frightening proposition — no matter the cost savings.

Filed Under: Save Money, Social Justice Tagged With: Amazon, Apple, data, drive, Facebook, Google, internet, Microsoft, Photos, Privacy, Search, Servers, Too big to fail

What Happens To Data After Death?

By Frugaling 2 Comments

Share This:

Francie and Me

I miss my grandmother. She brings tears to my eyes when I think back on our time together. She would’ve turned 98 last weekend. And while she lived a good, long life, she’s been dead for about eight years.

Sometimes I wonder what she’d say to me — what she’d think of my academic endeavors, writing, friends, and loves.

Would she be proud of her grandson? Would I be living up to her expectations? Would she understand how much I miss her?

There are times when I stare at an old photo of the two of us. There she is, in her pearl earrings — a gem from another generation. She was a product of a time when women demanded civil liberties and spoke out bravely. Individually, she was highly educated, musically gifted, crafted an alarmingly kind, talented group of friends. She attracted her equals. I admired her.

But now, as I reflect on these eight years, I long for a video, text, or email between us. Something I can click play on.

There is nothing. I can’t find any artifact nor proof of our love and affection — our bond. We only have a handful of progressively fading photographs. Burned, stained from the sun, time is making us increasingly more sepia and prone to rosy retrospection.

Towards the latter years of her life, I grabbed whatever technology I had — at the time, a Motorola Razr — and pointed the “camera” her way. She didn’t mind my intrusion. She didn’t “get” that there was a video camera on the phone. I held it up as she talked to one of her dear friends.

She was talking about me and said into the phone, “Yes, Sam’s going to Colorado University.” I chimed in, like I always had to as her memory waned, “No Francie, Colorado State University.” She quickly relayed that correction.

A few more seconds passed and I turned off the camera. Somehow I knew this would be one of the most important, last moments with her. Her hospice treatments had accelerated. She was becoming weaker, but her hands gripped firm with mine until the end. She’d pass away shortly after this call.

To have that file meant the video was mine. I’d have it as long as I’d like it. A rare glimpse, however distorted and pixelated that would take me back.

Her voice. Her demeanor. Her playfulness. For a few seconds.

It’d have to do. There wasn’t much else to cling and hold.

Maybe it was her birthday, or maybe it was my addiction to nostalgia; whatever it was, I looked for the clip the other day. I desperately wanted to relive it. To touch through time. To bridge the gap between life and death. To see the pixels dance before my eyes and make me feel… there.

Amidst gigabytes of photos and videos on my computer, the little clip was gone. I rummaged through flash drives, hard drives, cloud storage — nothing. There was no file to be found.

It was a foreign feeling — loss — amidst this digital era. We live in a time of Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, iMessage, WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, Gmail, Google Drive, iCloud, and Dropbox. Data costs little to nothing. And the world seems settled on one major goal: saving and storing your life for eternity.

Today, it’s not uncommon for me to send hundreds of texts, emails, and tweets in a day between friends and family — many of which include photos and videos.

I’m curious what Francie would think of these advancements. As I get older, the data seems to have a redundancy and staying power — beyond anything we could’ve imagined 10 years ago. She died before we started speaking to our phones, searching for rashes on WebMD, and sharing our meals over Facebook.

A file created today may well live beyond my lifetime, and maybe even my children’s (if I’m lucky enough to have them some day). What of these things would be passed onto future generations?

There’s that photo of me crossing the marathon finish line in Houston. There’s that kiss with my love in Colombia. There’s that random photo of my cousin and I when we were four years old — grinning from ear to ear. There’s that video tour of my old, Siberian-prison inspired apartment.

They’ll outlive me.

Storage is becoming cheaper every day. Companies are propositioning themselves to be the keeper of all your photos and videos, forever — just look at Google Photos. They’re saying they have the ultimate solution. Unlike my missing video of Francie, photos and videos are now saved and backed up; then, replicated across data centers across the globe. No flood, tornado, earthquake, hurricane, or mudslide can touch these memories. No user or device error can stop us now.

Maybe she belongs in the past, but she’d be here so much more amidst this technology. I could share a video of Francie to my partner. And I could connect with the memories that my mind slowly lets drift. Nothing would pass the intense scrutiny and analysis of today’s servers. The computers might serve the memories to me when I needed them most.

But what happens now? What will happen to our memories as they pass from generation to generation in this increasingly connected and backed up society? What will companies keep of us? What will our loved ones hold on to? What will they look to for connection with their pasts?

What will happen to our data after death?

Filed Under: Save Money Tagged With: Apple, Cloud, Cloud Storage, Computers, data, Dropbox, Facebook, family, Google, Google Drive, iCloud, iMessage, Memories, Photos, Servers, twitter

What If College Were A Right?

By Frugaling 2 Comments

Share This:

College Campuses Are Building Continuously

Ensuring your indebted future

Since my freshman year of college nine years ago, every university I’ve stepped foot on has been “under construction.” With streets closed, detours made, and buildings built to even greater heights, trillions are being spent across the country on “improvements.”

This hyper-development has led to increased tuition and fees for everyday students, but amidst this “progress” sits an all-too-quiet darkness: $1.2 trillion in student loan debt.

The construction, administrator salaries, and student fees (i.e., recreational centers) have all contributed to greater debts. Simultaneously, reduced state-based funding for tuition has saddled students with ever-growing amounts.

Almost every state — despite emphasizing the importance of educations — have cut, cut, cut. They’ve reduced burdens on taxpayers at the cost of individual college students.

Without money, the gap widens

We’ve pushed students into this bind. We’ve enabled this disempowerment and devolution. Now, students must take out student loans or ask wealthy parents. If the latter doesn’t exist, few options remain.

A vacuum has resulted. Private companies and universities have aimed to remedy the gap with digital universities and massive open online courses (MOOCs). These serve increasing populations of students looking for access to education — wherever it can be found. But these “solutions” do not provide the strength and privilege in an in-person education.

Maybe Udacity and MOOCs are incredible inventions, but would we even consider these options if educations were afforded to more people? Communication and engagement with the material, other students, and professors is weaker online.

Sitting in a seat, asking questions, and being an engaged student in a classroom still wins out. While online options might provide help to many, most people don’t learn very well watching a screen for hours on end.

Should student debt be an individual responsibility?

In America, we tend to value individual freedom over social good. The costs are simple: we don’t have a universal health system, paid family leave, or guaranteed vacation days with all employers. In this case, freedom means individual debt, burden, and struggle.

We believe that K-12 years should be taxpayer funded, and then suddenly stop. College educations shift to individual responsibility, as if it’s an optional concept in today’s economy.

Perhaps we cannot make sweeping changes to all these social programs. But maybe we can continue to strengthen the value of education as a right?

Where college education is a right

Thankfully, there’s another way. Much of Europe already has debt-free college educations for their people. For them, K-12 is just the start if you care to pursue additional education.

For some countries, this philosophy of education goes beyond their native-born populace and artificial borders. The University of Ljubljana in Slovenia provides free education to both foreign and native students. Americans have even gone there to dodge the debt in the States.

Americans could provide affordable educations to the masses. I’m a believer in this philosophy. People deserve quality educations in the richest country in the world. And citizens (at very least) could greatly benefit from this true access.

Students wouldn’t be cash strapped upon graduation. They’d buy homes, cars, and support your job and mine.

Instead, they’re forced to pay banks near-endless amounts of interest for decades and have nothing to show for it.

Filed Under: Save Money, Social Justice

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 49
  • Next Page »

Follow

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Best Of

  • Do I Regret Deleting My Facebook?
    Do I Regret Deleting My Facebook?
  • How Income Inequality Created The Vilest Empathy Gap
    How Income Inequality Created The Vilest Empathy Gap
  • 5 Profitable Skills All Professionals Should Learn
    5 Profitable Skills All Professionals Should Learn
  • Fox News Does Not Call This Class Warfare, But You Should
    Fox News Does Not Call This Class Warfare, But You Should
  • 8 TED Talks That Will Inspire You To Become A Minimalist
    8 TED Talks That Will Inspire You To Become A Minimalist
  • 5 Essentials For Paying Student Loans
    5 Essentials For Paying Student Loans

Recent Posts

  • Débuter en photographie sans se ruiner
  • How to Eat Healthy on a Budget
  • How To Live Stream Your Art
  • 5 Fun Summer Activities on a Budget
  • How to Pay Off Medical Debt

Search

Archives

  • August 2025 (1)
  • June 2023 (1)
  • May 2023 (2)
  • January 2023 (1)
  • March 2022 (3)
  • February 2022 (2)
  • November 2021 (1)
  • October 2021 (2)
  • August 2021 (4)
  • July 2021 (5)
  • June 2021 (3)
  • May 2021 (2)
  • January 2021 (2)
  • December 2020 (2)
  • October 2020 (2)
  • September 2020 (1)
  • August 2020 (3)
  • June 2020 (1)
  • May 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • February 2020 (2)
  • January 2020 (1)
  • December 2019 (1)
  • November 2019 (5)
  • September 2019 (4)
  • August 2019 (1)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • May 2019 (1)
  • April 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (3)
  • February 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • September 2018 (2)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • May 2018 (1)
  • April 2018 (5)
  • March 2018 (6)
  • February 2018 (4)
  • January 2018 (1)
  • December 2017 (10)
  • November 2017 (3)
  • July 2017 (2)
  • June 2017 (5)
  • May 2017 (2)
  • April 2017 (8)
  • March 2017 (4)
  • February 2017 (3)
  • January 2017 (2)
  • December 2016 (2)
  • November 2016 (4)
  • October 2016 (2)
  • September 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (4)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (3)
  • May 2016 (3)
  • April 2016 (4)
  • March 2016 (5)
  • February 2016 (2)
  • January 2016 (2)
  • December 2015 (3)
  • November 2015 (5)
  • October 2015 (5)
  • September 2015 (4)
  • August 2015 (6)
  • July 2015 (8)
  • June 2015 (6)
  • May 2015 (14)
  • April 2015 (14)
  • March 2015 (13)
  • February 2015 (12)
  • January 2015 (15)
  • December 2014 (10)
  • November 2014 (5)
  • October 2014 (6)
  • September 2014 (7)
  • August 2014 (12)
  • July 2014 (11)
  • June 2014 (12)
  • May 2014 (16)
  • April 2014 (13)
  • March 2014 (13)
  • February 2014 (9)
  • January 2014 (20)
  • December 2013 (9)
  • November 2013 (18)
  • October 2013 (15)
  • September 2013 (11)
  • August 2013 (11)
  • July 2013 (27)
  • June 2013 (18)
  • May 2013 (16)

Best Of

  • Contact
  • Do I Regret Deleting My Facebook?
  • How Income Inequality Created The Vilest Empathy Gap

Recent Posts

  • Débuter en photographie sans se ruiner
  • How to Eat Healthy on a Budget
  • How To Live Stream Your Art

Follow

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2026 · Modern Studio Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in