Frugaling

Save more, live well, give generously

I Owe $4,000 In Taxes!?

By 29 Comments

Share This:

Self-Employment Taxes Photo
Photo: Philip Taylor/Flickr

Frugaling my way out of debt

I’ve been a student of some sort nearly all my life. I never worried about ponying up extra funds for a tax payment until 2013. And honestly, when I created Frugaling, I had nearly $40,000 in debt from credit cards, a car loan, and student loans. There was no way the taxman would give me anything but a fat return.

Then, a financial miracle occurred. In the summer of 2013, I began to make thousands of dollars in affiliate/ad revenue from Frugaling. The money poured in, and I was giddy. Finally, I could begin paying off all the debt — in record time.

I dropped all of it into student loan debt, and paid off nearly everything (finished the rest in 2014). My nerves calmed, and I could suddenly see freedom and future. Cheesy, I know, but my loans had dampened my spirits. Suddenly, I was renewed.

Ugh, self-employment taxes

As this new influx of funds padded my wallet, I unfortunately realized that by the end of the year, the taxman would be knocking. All of these funds from Frugaling were coming in untaxed — no withholding. These are self-employment taxes. Ultimately, this income must be declared and taxed at a penalty rate to pay for social services (i.e., Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security).

After calculating all the money made and entering the numbers into TurboTax, the hypothetical refund reversed to a payment. The government wanted about $1,000. I sat there dumbfounded for a moment. All these advertisements and campaigns suggested I would “Get the biggest refund ever.” Those pesky self-employment taxes obliterated my student status.

It was a lesson in the difference between income and net worth. That year I had made over $30,000 between graduate student work and the website. I had barely any savings and negative net worth. Yet, I was being penalized for making money that could pay off financial aid faster. To me, it seemed preposterous that I was being taxed at a higher rate for this side income — with no net worth.

I owe Uncle Sam how much?!

In 2014, I paid off my remaining debt and my net worth has been hovering at a few thousand dollars. My stress over debt is non-existent, and I feel better than ever about my financial situation. But I’m not done with the struggle to make wealth while in graduate school.

I made over $20,000 “on the side” for Frugaling/business-related self-employment (I no longer make that kind of money, as I removed credit card affiliate links for now). After inserting my income and expenses into TurboTax, a shiver went down my spine. The numbers catapulted up over $4,000.

I’m fortunate that I’ve been saving for this moment. My savings account has enough to cover it, but my net worth will be swept away come mid-April. It feels awful to work this hard to save, make, and write. I have no net worth, and yet the funds I made will be disappearing.

But instead of letting this payment dampen my mood, I am more focused than ever on writing for you all, staying frugal and minimal, and building some real savings.

Are Private Equity Firms Job Creators? [Video]

By 1 Comment

Share This:

If you regularly read Frugaling, you know I don’t shy away from the socio-political concerns that hamper people’s ability to save and earn. I’m a firm believer that in our very classist society, some are earning more than their fair share and paying less to the federal government than ever. This feudal system has tragic consequences for the working poor.

In the past, I took aim at the concept of “job creators.” This term has been manipulated and contorted into a Fox News slogan for reverse classism — pitying the 1 percent because they are somehow being threatened. Well finally, someone at CNBC — Jim Cramer, no less — is critiquing the great myth of the American job creator class. Go Jim!

What’s your take, can private equity firms like Carlyle and Blackstone create jobs? Why or why not?

Tax Inversions: The Most Unpatriotic, Selfish, And Shortsighted Decision Companies Make

By 6 Comments

Share This:

Corporations Tax Inversion Evasion No Revenue

Tax evasion is persecuted heavily in the United States. If you’re caught keeping income away from the federal government, you could be looking at a hefty prison term and fine. This very crime that put Al Capone, the notorious mafia-gangster, behind bars. And yet, when companies dodge taxes, their shareholders rejoice. Nowadays, rapacious corporations are pushing the limit of U.S. tax laws by engaging in one of the sneakiest tax-dodging practices ever: tax inversions.

What are corporate tax inversions?

Bear with me as I try to explain a fairly complicated procedure. Essentially, corporations pay certain tax rates in America. Sometimes motivated by intrinsic greed — at other times by shareholders — corporate executives decide that moving their official headquarters to another, overseas location would be better for taxation. In switching to another country, with lower tax rates, they can pass on those savings to shareholders via greater earnings per share (via profit and revenue), larger stock buybacks, and more dividends. All they have to do is purchase another company that already has its headquarters in a tax haven.

When you own shares in a company like this, you can easily get swept up into this grand, wonderful idea. You’ll be getting more money for your investment and the company will be even more competitive. These are significant advantages — until you look at the dirty consequences.

When robber barons are more patriotic than today’s businesses…

Robber barons — 19th-century industrialists/capitalists — knew how to make money hand over fist. They could squeeze workers and make millions of dollars (billions when accounting for inflation). Many of these elite capitalists formed companies in finance, manufacturing, oil, and transportation. These industries were at the heart of American success; although, the robber barons made a lot more than your average, everyday peon.

There was a uniting factor to these antiquated moneymen: pride in country. They made their riches here, and much of the money flowed back into America. For instance, Andrew Carnegie, who started one of the largest steel manufacturers in the world, gave much of his wealth to schools (Carnegie Mellon University), museums, and libraries.

As America matured, tax laws and corporate structures evolved. Workers were offered more rights due to union memberships. Talk of a fair wage encouraged companies to pay more and protect workers. America became a booming economy, despite these new restrictions. Social welfare programs developed, as well, which sent people to college (affordably) and created Social Security. There was a respect for those who worked 40 years. The country believed they deserved to live safely after working so hard. Today’s businesses seem to have a different motivation.

How much do American companies have to pay in taxes?

Now, hardly a day goes by without a corporate executives complaining about excessive taxation. Steve Schwarzman famously compared the pressure for increased taxation to the invasion of Poland by the Nazis. Classy! Or, how about the Home Depot founder, Ken Langone, who said that increasing taxes, awareness of income inequality, and the Democratic agenda was “was what Hitler was saying in Germany.” Holy hyperbole! And the last one (that I’ll include in this article) comes from Tom Perkins, whose net worth is said to be around $8 billion. He said, “[there’s a] progressive war on the one percent…In the Nazi area it was racial demonization, now it is class demonization.” To put it simply, he’s saying that poor people clamoring for help is comparable to Nazis killing Jews. Better to bite your tongue, perhaps?!

Beyond the disturbing question of why some bigoted wealthy people freely invoke the Holocaust and its accompanying atrocities, I’m left wondering how bad it is in America for them. If people are that stirred up and eager to fight back poor people, tax increases, and basic rights for workers, these executives must be struggling. Alas, avoid the wellworks, the aforementioned Nazi-invokers are all billionaires. I trust they’ll find a way to pay their next meal.

Despite these clarion calls for tax revolution, American companies are doing well. In fact, corporations are seeing record profits year-over-year. How can this be happening in these awful, tax heavy times? Well, for large-cap corporations, they’re not. Armed with restless lawyers, accountants, and lobbyists, the largest companies march up to Capitol Hill and demand tax breaks. And you know what? It works.

Yesterday, CNBC reported on 20 (to name a few) companies that pay 0% in taxes. Take a look and see if you recognize any:

1. Merck
2. Seagate Tech
3. Thermo Fisher
4. General Motors
5. Public Storage
6. Iron Mountain
7. Newmont Mining
8. Eaton
9. Avalonbay
10. Kimco Realty
11. Prologis
12. Boston Properties
13. Apartment Investment
14. Plum Creek Timber
15. Citrix Systems
16. Crown Castle
17. Macerich
18. News Corp.
19. Essex Prop.
20. First Solar

These companies are likely benefiting from tremendous tax loopholes and writeoffs that are only available to them. From federal investments to research grants to special “one-time” discounts, they add up and suddenly the bill comes to $0.

That means that the preceding list doesn’t contribute a single dollar to our federal budget via traditional taxes. Moreover, they don’t properly fund our infrastructure that they rely on. Without the education, federal investments/breaks, transportation system, etc., these companies would have a devastatingly hard time finding success here.

Business-first media outlets such as the Wall Street Journal swiftly defend companies by saying:

“We’ve written for years about how the U.S. has the highest corporate income tax rate in the developed world, and that’s an incentive for all companies, wherever they are based, to invest outside the U.S.”

In this strange time when taxes are demonized, it’s important to realize that many companies aren’t paying their fair share. These claims that America has the highest corporate tax rate in the world don’t reflect the numerous benefits; after all, membership has its privileges and sometimes that includes sizable tax breaks.

How do corporate tax inversions hurt countries?

Despite this business-friendly reality, some companies still seek to lower their tax burdens — wherever they can find them. Tyco International, Fruit of the Loom, Ingersoll Rand, Transocean, and Eaton Corporation all successfully left the U.S. (for tax purposes), but they all still benefit from the infrastructure and development here. See, even after you leave a country, its people, and suck another $1 billion into your coffers because of the move, we welcome you to do business here with open arms.

It’s sickening. Companies vacate the U.S. for places like the Cayman Islands, Ireland, and Switzerland, where the corporate taxes are zero percent. Americans, again, lose all that tax revenue that would’ve gone to state and federal programs. This all contributes to widening budget gaps, shortfalls, and growing austerity measures. Then, the welcoming nation holds out open arms for the new company. But despite the new headquarters, they make zero percent from their new neighbors.

This is a brutal act that causes disruption for both countries. With zero percent coming in for either party, they both suffer the consequences of a newly globalized world.

Globalization was supposed to bring greater diversity and talent. Suddenly, the world is flat, right? Aren’t we supposed to be benefiting from a shared upward mobility? When tax inversions are employed, it’s hard to see how anyone could possibly benefit — except for a select few shareholders and corporate executives.

What If Hollywood’s Portrayal Of Wall Street Were Real? Bankers Would Be Jailed

By Leave a Comment

Share This:

Bubbles burst: The rising action

On October 19, 1987, Wall Street crashed in one of the worst days ever. The financial world called this horrific day, “Black Monday.” The market was up 44% in the seven months prior to the implosion, and a solid bubble had formed. Various events simultaneously led up to that date, and the market crashed. We were supposed to learn from our mistakes, but we never do.

Just two months after the crash, the film Wall Street debuted. The fanfare was incredible. Here was a market that was reeling from excess, greed, and smarmy bankers. Now, a movie capitalized on America’s dislike for financiers. The tragic irony is that instead of crushing and discouraging careers on Wall Street, it has only seemed to encourage what it vilified.

Greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right. Greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures, the essence of the evolutionary spirit. Greed, in all of its forms; greed for life, for money, for love, knowledge, has marked the upward surge of mankind and greed, you mark my words, will not only save Teldar Paper, but that other malfunctioning corporation called the U.S.A. —Gordon Gekko

Banks hardly struggled hiring scientists, engineers, and other people that make millions to trade in derivatives, bundle credit default swaps, and apply their mathematical talent to make even more money. Instead of manufacturing and creating, they’re pushing money.

In the above clip from Boiler Room, a young Vin Diesel can be seen reciting an essential part of the movie Wall Street. The fellow traders look on; all knowing the lines, as well. While Boiler Room may simply be a fictionalized tale of pump-and-dump schemes, it appears to highlight a truth: when traders heard Gordon Gekko say “greed is good,” they believed it.

See, in our current paradigm, it doesn’t matter what you say. As an analyst, banker, trader, etc., you can spout off what you want and never suffer retribution or consequences. In fact, you’ll usually be given a bonus, more time on tv, and an opportunity to be touted as a Wall Street success story.

Needing, wanting, desperate for money: The conflict

I’ve talked to a few friends that entered banking and financial positions. The heart of Oliver Stone’s Wall Street is missed by many of them. What’s comprehended is a surface level understanding of the antagonist — pre-jail sentence. It all adds up to a simple conclusion: Make your money, stay out of jail, and the hell with consequences.

Today’s movies are an extension of the same horrific story. Usually, some sort of humble but nascently narcissistic young man gets exposed to the world of money. They want a better life — sometimes for their families and sometimes solely for themselves. By becoming a trader, pumper-and-dumper, or insider, the riches seem easy.

Warning shots are fired. Loved ones beg Jordan Belfort and Seth Davis — repeatedly — to stop engaging in questionable practices. They urge them to change their ways before it’s too late and the FBI comes knocking. Even after that, some of them can’t stop their errant ways. The money is too great to stop.

Get your bonuses, cars, and women: The climax

In the Wolf of Wall Street, Jordan Belfort cheats on one woman after another, lies to each, and gets away with everything. Nearly every movie about Wall Street portrays bankers in this way. They seem to be saying, “The hell with authority. I don’t need to worry.”

This is the good life. They are fighting for it, with every last breath. In the movies, you know that the authorities are on their tail. You can see that all is not well. You’re omniscient to the steep, precipitous decline that’s in order. In real life, the good life will likely be maintained.

Everything is collapsing: The (false) falling action

Here’s where I wish that these fictionalized accounts were based on real life. It doesn’t take long to realize that bankers and traders are regularly engaging in questionable business practices. Their monies are too great — even for the authorities (i.e., too big to fail). By standing behind corporations, it’s rare if anyone takes the downfall. The corporation bears the responsibility. Just look at the recent HSBC money laundering for drug cartels and terrorist groups.

At least in the movies someone gets put in jail nearly every time. Nowadays, that’s a rarity. In fact, most bankers don’t even need to admit wrongdoing through a “guilty” verdict. No, all they need to do is pay a government agency a paltry sum that barely equates to a couple week’s revenue. The punishment is a slap on the wrist and the individual profits are retained — the bonuses and salaries are kept.

FBI and governmental hearings are a joke in many instances. Senators take bankers “to task” and “grill” executives with “tough” questions, which are then placed on YouTube with those key phrases. Usually, the words are used by a Congressperson’s own staffers. They become packaged up junk that can be brought back to angry constituents. They seem to be saying, “Don’t worry, your Congressperson is doing something, look at this video!”

Yelling, calling, and shouting at bankers isn’t what this market needs. We deserve better than that. The market needs better than that.

Nothing is worse than watching the scenes after each other. For example, check out the following scene from the Wolf of Wall Street. Here, you’ll see Jordan Belfort and his cronies deny all wrongdoing and recollection of maleficence. Compare that to the previous, real life instance with Goldman Sachs.

Nothing gets done, learned: The (false) resolution

It gets old, but every time a bubble bursts, bankers commit a crime, and/or the average American suffers, the White House and Congress get vocal and appear furious. The previous section shows their powerful vitriol.

After the verbal aggression ends, and the stories calm down, everyone stops talking about issues in the financial markets. Instead, we’re back to exclaiming how wonderful it is that the market is at all-time highs — doomed to repeat our mistakes. Will we ever learn?

While Obama and Congress will speak up immediately following every criminal activity or crash, by not receiving harsher punishments, bankers can gamble on. American may not condone the action of HSBC executives for laundering money for cartels, and slap them with $800 million in fines, but the executives walk free. We’ve created a unpunishable playground for adult children — only seeking their own selfish desires for more and more wealth.

We move on from bank to bank, bubble to bubble, and history just seems to repeat itself. We don’t seem to learn from our financial mistakes. We don’t truly censure, reprimand, and jail those who commit financial atrocities (on television or in boardroom meetings), either. We’ve created a perfect poison for market movers to manipulate our wallets in the grandest stadiums of all time.

How many times will the average American suffer from this repeated bubble and burst cycle, market manipulation, and financial greed? When will we act to prevent these actions from ever happening again?

Best Of

Recent Posts

Follow