Frugaling

Save more, live well, give generously

How Leases Trap College Students

By 5 Comments

Share This:

How Leases Trap Students

I live in a nice apartment. The bathroom is large, kitchen is brand new, ceilings are high, and my roommate and I have held many parties. When something goes wrong, the maintenance promptly fixes things – often the same day. It’s been a refreshing experience, but it’s come with a price and harbinger for higher education in general.

When I first entered graduate school, rent was about $400 with Internet and cable (not including utilities). I lived in Soviet-themed (unintentionally) barracks the university built in a flood zone. The entire area had flooded repeatedly (including many of the buildings). They weren’t necessarily up to “code,” but they were utilitarian and met my needs.

After two years of living, they decided it was time to tear them down and build up new buildings. I couldn’t blame the university. Unfortunately, there was a catch: private construction and land management companies would now control the buildings. Flirting with private and public lands (as I go to a public university), the university sold the building rights to the company. Now, my apartments are owned by a private company and the public land is leased to them.

While the apartments were brand-spanking new, it came with a flashy price: $550 per month with a roommate. I found a great one, and we’ve been living here ever since. From around $400 to $550 was a tremendous leap. But I justified it because it would keep me “on campus,” on the free bus route, and rentals are regularly expensive in the city. The old price didn’t really exist in the city, as it was university subsidized. Additionally, it would limit my moving expenses, as I would carry my stuff across the block.

Then something strange happened last year. Half way into my lease, a brochure was placed in my door frame. It said, “Take advantage of a great opportunity to renew your lease…at a discounted rate!” That first sentence sent off alarm bells in my head; I thought, “here comes a sales pitch.”

If my roommate and I renewed early, we’d receive this so-called discounted rate, but it was made worse by a bold-faced exclamation, “The first 100 residents that renew will get a discounted renewal rate!”

Both of us eyed the brochure and looked at the rate. At first I thought we’d actually be saving money because the table outlined “annual savings.” More closely, we realized they would be charging us $10 more. Despite all the rhetoric about savings, we’d be paying $120 more a year, each. Then, the company had combined it with a time-sensitive offer. They had clearly read some awful business books that encourage these tactics at the expense of consumer hatred.

The kicker was a third element: information about how expensive and difficult it is to move. As a skeptical reader I wondered why they were including information about “truck rental,” “utility transfers and deposits,” and “application fees.” Simply put, they wanted to psychologically implant loss potentials by using classic business techniques. The company wanted to reduce the likelihood of a move.

Despite my hate for the technique, it was true. Because we were graduate students, on tight schedules, and fearful of awful landlords (the city is full of them), we accepted the $240 total increase.

A year passed without much concern. Yesterday, I came home to an updated brochure. It was entirely the same except for the amount owed and leasing year. All the same rhetoric was used: “annual savings,” “the first 100 residents,” and information about moving expenses.

Another increase stared back at me: $480 per year per person. I was stunned. Over two years, the private land management company hiked the price $600 for leases annually. And horrifically, it’s even worse for new leases. Now, my roommate and I have a major decision to make.

This story is about more than one rental company’s tactics. Rather, this article is about the wicked decline of public institutions. What used to be highly subsidized, affordable housing for graduate students, quickly declined to a gentrified area (all the families and international students left). The university no longer needs to manage the land and they receive leasing payments, but they have little control of the land management’s prices and sales tactics.

By understanding these tactics and the privatization of public university property among rising student loan debt is a recipe for resentment. Raising prices $600 per year for each person becomes a formidable sum. Think about how $600 each year over the course of a five-year graduate school career equates to $3000 in extra housing costs, which are often at 6.8% interest with federal aid. That adds up, as do the future payments.

While people could move out, year round schedules and limited savings become a trap for many students. With strict budgets that limit freedom to afford truck rentals, rent cleaning products, and pay for utility transfers, we are a vulnerable population. Many are restricted by these methods.

The privatization of public property might be an omen for continued demises in higher education. By pushing towards a business model, students will bear the brunt of these horrid policies.

We’re at a tremendous precipice in academia. As we play limbo with students lives, I cannot help but wonder when we’ll find the bottom because we’re walking straight towards it.

Debt: The Destroyer Of Dreams?

By 17 Comments

Share This:

Colorado State University The Oval

Student loans ruined my relationship with money. It ripped out executive functioning of the prefrontal cortex, spit, stomped, and rolled it flat with a rolling pin. The critical-thinking components died an unfriendly, brief death. Suddenly, I couldn’t think straight or make sense of the “cost” of anything. I was the walking automaton with a mantra that wouldn’t stop: click, swipe, buy, repeat.

When you own nothing, the bank owns you. The lack of money became a thief of sleep, calm, and patience. This emotional vertigo sucked the fun out of future-oriented goals and dreams, as everything had reservations: lives comprised from decades by debt. In this confusing, cyclical spin, I temporarily lost the clarity that can be found within goals.

New questions refused to leave me alone. Why did I pursue this route in the first place? How will I possibly pay this off? Who can actually help me if something goes wrong? Where do I go for objective advice and feedback?

Then came questions about aging. How old will I be when the debt is done? What age will I be when I retire? How will I retire? Will I ever retire? How can, potentially, six-figures of student loan debt be paid off?

Lastly, were the questions about life and debt. What happens to my debt if I die before paying it off? Will it be passed on to a spouse, child, etc.? What if I left the country and never came back? What would I do if I got injured and either missed or was no longer able to make loan payments?

I briefly considered debt forgiveness plans. In some circumstances and areas of study, the federal government “forgives” debt after on-time payments after agreed upon periods of time. Debt forgiveness would allow me to wipe the slate clean, and be free faster. But I couldn’t wrap my head around the concern that might come from not graduating or being able to pay on time. What if something/anything interrupted my plans?

Debt is the ultimate restriction of freedom. From dreams at night to dreams of the future, debt knows no boundaries. It doesn’t politely wait for your day to begin or end. It’s the constant burbling and gurgling noise that confuses focus. And I’d be shocked if debt doesn’t restrain students’ ability to study and proficiently pass through school.

Nobody deserves this discomfort and stress. While many parents fork over gigantic savings for their children to attend college, countless undergraduate students pay their own way. As a culture, we’ve exalted the role of higher education and repeatedly shown statistics for success. “You’ll make more over your life as a college graduate,” they say. And they’re right, most people do.

Unfortunately, not everyone can or will take the same path. What if you aren’t excelling in college and decide to drop out? What if you get hurt in the four years of college? What if, what if, what if…?

For every student that decides to pay their own way through college, they take a leap of faith in themselves. Our culture admires their choice, risk, and self-investment. But despite this admiration, we do not reward them by heavily subsidizing their educations. Instead, we enshrine them in debt bubbles that are ready to burst.

Debt becomes the great opportunity maker; unfairly, as only some of us will carry this burden and it totals over $1.2 trillion.

As a country, we need to attack this debt — the wealthy and impoverished, together. The United States should be a leader in education for the masses. Between 5 and 18, we suggest that people deserve it. We say it’s a right. Children should receive a rounded education. Then, you graduate high school and — poof! — the right becomes a privilege afforded to the wealthiest among us.

To solve the debt crisis, we must rethink the entire privilege-based system of higher education in America. Fundamentally, we need to wrap our heads around our economic needs for an educated, working-age populace. The immoral shackles of debt that we place on hardworking students shouldn’t exist.

President Barack Obama, Student Loans, And The Need For Reform

By 5 Comments

Share This:

2016 is fast approaching, and that means election season. Major news networks will stalk and highlight candidates from left and right sides of the aisle. In this highly televised and recorded world, nearly everything will be analyzed and critiqued – moment-by-moment. The primaries will be a grueling process where candidates likely undercut their opponents and new ideals.

As contenders begin to take form, I can’t help but think about what issues will be most important for my generation and those to come. Financially, we are hurting. Millennials are not saving at the rates of previous generations. We are entering the workforce with record levels of debt and stagnant wages. Despite a somewhat recovered economy, we are starting behind the curve.

One of the biggest reasons for our trouble is student loan debt. In fact, it eclipses all other forms from credit cards to cars to mortgages. America is addicted to debt, but the favorite kind seems to center on youth pursuing educations. Unfortunately, this policy of placing higher cost burden on students has led to numerous unintended consequences. Graduates are suffering, despite being raised to believe that college was a simple path to prosperity.

There are few reasons for hope. Congress is a house divided. They’re split on nearly everything, and funding education via taxation isn’t on the table. This instability and counterproductive snowball-lobbing Congress cripples younger generations.

Thankfully, there’s a light amidst this partisan dueling: President Barack Obama. He recently sat down with a few high school and college students to talk about issues in education and student loans. The President acknowledged that he only paid off his own student loans in full the year before he entered congress, and that they were more than his home mortgage.

Instantaneously, the sometimes-deified leader of “the free world” became real. The students that filled the room nodded in unison and seemed appreciative. The President leaned in, and questioned the group about their own experiences.

He asked one student what she wished she would’ve known or something that was difficult about the process. She responded that student loan interest was mentioned, but not entirely explained. And she’s not alone. Most college students don’t have a firm grasp of what student loans can do. The President kindly responded that institutions tend to just hand the bill at the end of college.

This was a man who aimed to talk with students around this country – not just in that room. And no matter how planned, prepared, staged, and for-show this event was, it highlighted something rare and powerful in politics: approachability.

This administration and President must’ve known that this segment for Vice News would provide positive sentiment for the White House. But that shouldn’t matter, because this is how that office chose to connect – in a radically different way than every office before it. Regardless of the calculated nature of the time with these students, it made an impressive impact.

In a political world that could not be more hostile and aggressive, we need politicians that sit down with younger generations and empathize with the struggle in higher education. There’s hope for a better future if more do so.

Come 2016, I want to see a candidate who can sit down with younger generations and truly lean in. I want a future president who’s approachable for diverse – socioeconomically disenfranchised – people.

President Barack Obama and his staff have mastered this element, and I look forward to someone who can do even better. We need action and reform to solve the student loan crisis.

Financial Strength Through Unity

By 9 Comments

Share This:

Union Strikers
Photo: Kheel Center/Flickr

We get paid to go to school?!

I had this misconception about graduate school. See, I thought that when I worked for the university, added to the research landscape, and taught undergraduate courses, my own tuition and student fees would be paid. Even when I entered the University of Iowa for graduate school, I didn’t completely understand the financial obligations that are placed on students.

My first year as an instructor and employee of the university, I was quarter-time. That meant I would get 25% of a salaried employee (just over $10,000 per year). Additionally, because of my graduate student status, I’d receive a “tuition waiver.” This benefit sealed the deal and made graduate school sort of “affordable.”

Across the graduate colleges at the university, the majority of students received a 100% tuition waiver. Inexplicably, my college didn’t receive that benefit. That meant that around $2,000 per year of my tuition would come from the “paychecks.” To make matters worse, student fees cost about $2,400 per year.

If you’re doing the math with me, that means that I was getting paid in my first year of being a graduate student: about $10,000 minus $2,000 for tuition and $2,400 for student fees. It equaled roughly $5,600. Now, that quarter-time salary was decimated. Money for rent, food, and regular budgetary expenses disappeared. I had to take out loans to live.

Aren’t we trying to “better” ourselves?

As the years passed, I was afforded more opportunities and a semi-living wage. I was able to pay off my debt with my side income and stay away from student loans through a better “paycheck.” But the tuition waiver gap and student fees meant that I still paid much of it back to the school.

Those pursuing higher educations and degrees for more competitive employment should be commended. Unfortunately, our society and system doesn’t necessarily allow for all those to succeed.

Considering the cost of a graduate degree and the years of minimized/lost wages, it is an expensive proposition. Inherently, that means that only a select class of privileged individuals are more able to pursue this education. The consequences of pursuing a graduate degree without funding and few assets can be horrific, and lead to massive student loans.

That’s why students sometimes need to collectively bargain, unionize, and ask for better treatment.

Hope for a more respectful future

Last week, the union for graduate students at the University of Iowa accomplished something amazing. After months of consternation, threats to the tuition waivers, and proposed student fee increases from higher ups, the union demanded respect. They wouldn’t budge.

They asked for a 100% student fee waiver. While they didn’t receive that, the bargain was a 25% student fee cut for those on assistantships (working for the university).

They asked for a real 100% tuition waiver for all graduate students across the colleges. And they received that! Now, certain colleges within the university system that charged more tuition will be equalized.

Additionally, the union lobbied to provide better health coverage for transgender individuals, single-parent households, and much more. It was a moment of hope — of acceptance for diverse populations and classes.

And just like that, I received a nearly $3,000 raise! Without the union, I would still be bitterly explaining — to everyone who’ll listen — that my $22,000 ($18,000 after taxes) salary doesn’t actually equal what I take home.

The importance of collective goals

Unions have been villainized recently. Take Governor Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota, who said, “In many cases, [unions] exploit and abuse the taxpayers.” These disparaging remarks undercut the importance of unions for actors, on-air talent, auto-workers, politicians, teachers, students, professors, and countless others.

Historically, collective bargaining and unionization helped employee wages, voting rights, and improved safety in some of the most dangerous industries. Businesses weren’t interested in helping workers, and they didn’t have incentives to change.

When workers came together, worked towards similar goals, and collectivized, employers listened. If history repeats itself, then we ought to reflect on this lesson. Change and respect for students and others across the world will come from the bottom-up — not the top-down.

Best Of

Recent Posts

Follow