Frugaling

Save more, live well, give generously

  • Home
  • Start Here
  • Popular
    • Archives
  • Recommended
  • Contact
  • Save Money
    • Lifestyle Downgrade
    • Save Money with Mindfulness
    • Save at Starbucks
    • Psychological Trick To Reduce Your Online Shopping
    • Best Freebies
  • Minimalism
    • 8 TED Talks To Become A Minimalist
    • We Rent This Life
    • Everything Must Go
    • Lifestyle Downgrade
    • The Purchase Paradox: Wanting, Until You Own It
    • Nothing In My Pockets
  • Social Justice
    • Destroy The 40-Hour Workweek
    • Too Poor To Protest: Income Inequality
    • The New Rich: How $250k A Year Became Middle Class
    • Hunter Gatherers vs. 21st Century Desk-sitters
  • Make Money
    • Make $10k in 10 Months
    • Monetize Your Blog
    • Side Hustle for Serious Cash
  • Loans
    • 5 Rules To Follow Before Accepting Student Loans
    • Would You Marry Me?
    • Should I Have a Credit Card If I’m In Debt?
    • $50k in Scholarships in 70 Minutes

“We Are Rich Because They Are Poor.”

By Frugaling 13 Comments

Share This:

Norway could be heaven on Earth

Norwegians have an average life expectancy of 81 years, income of $58,810, and one of the best education systems in the world. With a highly social tax system, Norwegians benefit from incredible health care, free college opportunities, and more paid time off when compared to most of the world.

Other than brutal winters, Norway is a near-utopian country with a smaller divide between wealthy and impoverished. There’s incredible privilege in this economy.

A Norwegian newspaper, Aftenposten, decided to select three prominent fashion bloggers — Frida, Ludvig, and Anniken — to journey to Cambodia. These bloggers obsess and pour over the latest fashion trends. They write and photograph their latest finds for the world to see. Additionally, they make money from their features through advertisements and endorsement deals.

Welcome to Cambodia!

Aftenposten wanted to expose these bloggers to the garment workers on the other end of the manufacturing industry for their favorite clothes. As many of the worst worker conditions and best trade relations are in South Asian countries, they selected Cambodia.

With personal cameras, beaming smiles, and naive curiosity, these three traveled to Cambodia to “discover” what garment workers’ jobs are like — for a month. Almost instantly after they landed in the foreign land, they remarked about how they expected more “shops,” cleaner markets, and cheaper food prices.

They immediately experienced culture shock — from privilege to poverty in one flight.

Wages that keep people in poverty

Over the course of the next five episodes, the three explore their neighborhood and interview garment workers. The first, Sokty, tells about making around $3-4 per day. She usually works 7 days a week, and often works from 7 AM to 8 PM.

Sokty sleeps on her floor, covered in some blankets. Her shower is a bucket, where she pours water over herself. She has a clothes line that is about 5 feet long and has a few shirts.  She can’t afford to buy the clothes she sews.

There’s a TV, and some photos are pasted to her walls. To many Americans, this austerity and poverty is likely uncomfortable. Societally, we tend to rationalize away these discomforts, rather than face them.

Empathy through exposure

Anniken initially appears uncomfortable, but explains away this feeling by saying they don’t know any better/different. Further, she points out that these Cambodian garment workers are probably used to it, and that’s why they’re okay with this disparity.

Without even a sliver of remorse, sadness, or regret, her explanation weighs heavy for the remaining episodes. They’re a harbinger for a painful self-discovery of ignorance.

See, as the month-long journey flies by, the group becomes increasingly aware of their false assumptions and prejudices about garment workers in far away places. They realize that these people deserve better. And that they — as fashion bloggers — have a role in changing it.

Sometimes it’s as simple as exposure. By accepting the request to appear in a reality series, these three Norwegians grew immensely. One aspect that seemed to change their understanding was trying to buy a dinner on three garment paychecks for the day ($9 total). They cooked the most basic food, which was heavily watered down to feel like more.

“We are rich because they are poor.”

By the conclusion, their voices were unified in disgust and shame for their buying habits. They suddenly realized the consequences of their shopping habits. The Norwegians wrapped up filming with a new resolution: go back home and share their story with others. Ultimately, they wanted to pressure major clothing retailers to choose more worker-friendly locations, paychecks, and rights.

Repeatedly, Ludvig noted how their lives were great in Norway, because theirs (Cambodian garment workers’) “suck.” His words spoke to the fundamental horror of capitalism: where one succeeds, another falls.

We’ve set up a system of trading and exchange, where some people’s money goes further than others. There’s a reason most of our clothing is manufactured elsewhere, and it’s not because they have vastly more productive workers — they just have fewer restrictions and depressed incomes.

That’s not a solution for a fair, just society.

Here are three ways we can correct these inequalities:

1. Support retailers that pay laborers living wages
2. Petition/write companies and Congress to support living wages
3. Prefer local clothing companies, where possible

Share the wealth:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Social Justice Tagged With: Cambodia, Clothing, Income Inequality, Norway, poor, poverty, rich, Social Justice, trade, Wealth

Comments

  1. Justin says

    February 4, 2015 at 7:27 am

    This is a helpful and thought-provoking read. What are the best resources for evaluating and comparing American retail chains? It seems like it should be easy to end sweat-shop labor and the like with awareness.

    Reply
    • Sam Lustgarten says

      February 4, 2015 at 8:29 am

      Justin,

      That’s a terrific question!

      Here are a couple websites you should check out:

      Here are a few popular brands: http://www.treehugger.com/style/are-these-unethical-fashion-brands-hiding-in-your-closet.html

      &

      This is an article about dealing with sweatshop labor, and how to reform it: http://www.greenamerica.org/PDF/GuideSweatshops.pdf

      &

      Here’s another list of retailers: http://www.buzzfeed.com/alexrees/23-brands-caught-in-sweatshop-scandals#.jwa5zpmjZ

      Hope this helps,
      Sam

      Reply
  2. Anne@52SmallChallenges says

    February 4, 2015 at 7:35 am

    Great post! Thanks for sharing this. Even if one didn’t take this inequality into account, frugal and minimalist living probably helps, by leading us to buy fewer new things and make do with what we already own. Often things made locally cost more, but they’re likely to last longer. I wonder what those garment workers would think if they walked into a thrift store in the US and saw all the cast-offs.

    Reply
    • Sam Lustgarten says

      February 4, 2015 at 8:30 am

      Anne,

      Wonderfully put! Thanks for commenting.

      Sam

      Reply
  3. Karen says

    February 4, 2015 at 9:36 am

    Great title for this post. Hearing about these situations really puts everything into perspective and makes us count our blessings. Lately I have been shopping more at consignment stores and thinking twice before I buy clothing. My closet is pretty bare for a female.

    Reply
  4. Larissa from Australia says

    February 4, 2015 at 6:07 pm

    Logically, if we buy less clothing that originated in sweat shops, these people will receive even less money for the work they do. I am in no way condoning the practice at all but that would be the direct result.
    Conditions must change to change their lives. Equality of pay and workers rights across the globe would be a goal.
    How could we as the “little people” even begin to effect this change?

    Reply
    • Sam Lustgarten says

      February 4, 2015 at 10:11 pm

      Larissa,

      This is a great question and myth of the industry. Essentially, people ask, “If we don’t buy from them, will they make any money? Isn’t it better to at least support them a bit?” Well, I’m not going to say “no” outright, but there seem to be better ways to “give” to people in need then shopping through multinational corporations that pay for sweatshop-style labor. Perhaps we can take the money we would otherwise spend on these clothes and put them towards causes trying to change that? Just an idea!

      I think we “little people” have lots more power to effect change than we lend ourselves!

      Thanks for your comment,
      Sam

      Reply
  5. taylorqlee says

    February 4, 2015 at 8:14 pm

    I agree with 1 and 2, but only with 3 insofar as it makes it slightly more likely worker will have better living conditions (assuming the company you’re buying from doesn’t run an American sweatshop instead). However, as someone whose parents were in the commercial fashion industry a long time ago who set up shop in one of these cheap SE Asian countries, I do think there is a way to do off-shoring work ethically, in a way that benefits both consumers and workers (assuming they are paid good, living wages and these foreign businesses are adding to rather than killing off what other economic development would be happening in the region) and I commend companies that achieve ethical worker conditions, even if those workers don’t happen to be American.

    Reply
    • Sam Lustgarten says

      February 4, 2015 at 10:13 pm

      Taylor,

      Love this comment! Thanks for sharing about your parents’ experience and that with living wages, the work can be ethical. I’d agree with that entirely! But living wages must come first. Everyone deserves that…

      Sam

      Reply
  6. thebrokeandbeautifullife says

    February 6, 2015 at 7:37 am

    I’m trying to be better about “voting with my dollars”. Admittedly, I’ll succumb to buying something I wouldn’t want to support just because it’s cheap, but I’m trying to make that the exception rather than the rule. Paying more for local, humane products is definitely worthwhile.

    Reply
  7. swissrose says

    February 7, 2015 at 4:04 pm

    Check out Labourbehindthelabel.org…

    Reply
  8. Marie Inshaw says

    February 13, 2015 at 10:07 am

    I’ve got a different opinion.
    A while ago Marketplace Money did a long report about the life of a t-shirt from the farm in the US to cast-off in Africa. One story was in Bangladesh focusing on 2 sisters working in a garment factory. The eldest sister was married off as a teenager, the younger, wasn’t. Why? Because the factory came and the younger sister had value to the family as a factory worker who sent money home and not a burden to the family, she wasn’t forced into child marriage. She was free to leave home, single, which allows her all sorts of freedoms. I am so good with that. If freedom for women in other nations come at the price of one less factory in the States, that’s a decent price for others’ liberation.
    I have a neighbor who travels to South American ghettos. The saddest thing was that little boys aspired to be drug dealers and the girls prostitutes. Why? Because those are the only ones the kids see has having money. They need opportunities. My ancestors got opportunities during the Great Migration. A northern sweatshop gave a lot more opportunity than a southern sharecrop.
    So lets look at the realistic alternatives for women in developing nations have without industrialization or opportunity. It looks like human trafficking, child marriage, and grinding rural poverty.
    Realistically we need to be willing to pay more for clothing, other things and services from other nations and practice providing value for what they produce so they too can find value for their daughters beyond their sexuality and value for their sons beyond their brawn.

    Reply
    • Sam Lustgarten says

      February 13, 2015 at 12:09 pm

      Marie,

      Thank you so much for your comment and perspective. I agree that people need opportunities. Unfortunately, our society hasn’t exactly respected the laborers and workers on the other side of the trade. If we were to buy products and the people were given living wages, everyone would win. Yes, the products would be more expensive to manufacture, but there are many ways to deal with that.

      All the best,
      Sam

      Reply

Join the Conversation: Cancel reply

Follow

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Best Of

  • The New Rich: How $250k A Year Became Middle Class
    The New Rich: How $250k A Year Became Middle Class
  • 5 Tricks To Save Money At Starbucks (Updated)
    5 Tricks To Save Money At Starbucks (Updated)
  • 8 TED Talks That Will Inspire You To Become A Minimalist
    8 TED Talks That Will Inspire You To Become A Minimalist
  • What Are The Best Sites For Freebies?
    What Are The Best Sites For Freebies?
  • Destroy The 40-Hour Workweek
    Destroy The 40-Hour Workweek
  • Is Frozen Juice Cheaper?
    Is Frozen Juice Cheaper?

Recent Posts

  • First-Time Landlord: Know Your Rights to Protect Yourself from Bad Tenants
  • Increase Your Revenue Simply by Being a Great Manager
  • How to Earn Extra Income During the Lockdown
  • 4 Ways That Residential Replacement Windows Will Help
  • 4 Tips for Deciding if a Personal Loan Offer is Right For You

Search

Archives

  • January 2021 (1)
  • December 2020 (2)
  • October 2020 (2)
  • September 2020 (1)
  • August 2020 (3)
  • June 2020 (1)
  • May 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • February 2020 (2)
  • January 2020 (1)
  • December 2019 (1)
  • November 2019 (5)
  • September 2019 (4)
  • August 2019 (1)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • May 2019 (1)
  • April 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (3)
  • February 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • September 2018 (2)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • May 2018 (1)
  • April 2018 (5)
  • March 2018 (6)
  • February 2018 (4)
  • January 2018 (1)
  • December 2017 (10)
  • November 2017 (3)
  • July 2017 (2)
  • June 2017 (5)
  • May 2017 (2)
  • April 2017 (8)
  • March 2017 (4)
  • February 2017 (3)
  • January 2017 (2)
  • December 2016 (2)
  • November 2016 (4)
  • October 2016 (2)
  • September 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (4)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (3)
  • May 2016 (3)
  • April 2016 (4)
  • March 2016 (5)
  • February 2016 (2)
  • January 2016 (2)
  • December 2015 (3)
  • November 2015 (5)
  • October 2015 (5)
  • September 2015 (4)
  • August 2015 (6)
  • July 2015 (8)
  • June 2015 (6)
  • May 2015 (14)
  • April 2015 (14)
  • March 2015 (13)
  • February 2015 (12)
  • January 2015 (15)
  • December 2014 (10)
  • November 2014 (5)
  • October 2014 (6)
  • September 2014 (7)
  • August 2014 (12)
  • July 2014 (11)
  • June 2014 (12)
  • May 2014 (16)
  • April 2014 (13)
  • March 2014 (13)
  • February 2014 (9)
  • January 2014 (20)
  • December 2013 (9)
  • November 2013 (18)
  • October 2013 (15)
  • September 2013 (11)
  • August 2013 (11)
  • July 2013 (27)
  • June 2013 (18)
  • May 2013 (16)

Best Of

  • The New Rich: How $250k A Year Became Middle Class
  • 5 Tricks To Save Money At Starbucks (Updated)
  • 8 TED Talks That Will Inspire You To Become A Minimalist

Recent Posts

  • First-Time Landlord: Know Your Rights to Protect Yourself from Bad Tenants
  • Increase Your Revenue Simply by Being a Great Manager
  • How to Earn Extra Income During the Lockdown

Follow

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 · Modern Studio Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in